Evaluation of University Students’ Critical Thinking When Confronted with AI-Generated Responses: An Approach to Developing Reflective Education
PDF

Keywords

Generative language tools
AI
Critical thinking
Educational transformation

How to Cite

1.
Zurita Cruz CE, Martínez García VM, Díaz Romero Y, Cobián Campos JA. Evaluation of University Students’ Critical Thinking When Confronted with AI-Generated Responses: An Approach to Developing Reflective Education. SAP Multidisciplinary Open [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 12 [cited 2026 Sep. 18];4:183. Available from: https://mo.southam.pub/index.php/mo/article/view/183

Abstract

The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is profoundly transforming the methods of constructing, transmitting, and assimilating knowledge, particularly in academic contexts. Through generative language models such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini, among others, precise and contextualized responses are generated, enabling students to actively explore concepts and ideas. The integration of these tools represents a balancing act: leveraging their potential to optimize academic efficiency and learning while simultaneously fostering the development of critical and autonomous thinking. This study examines how two prominent Mexican institutions, the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) and the Autonomous University of Sinaloa (UAS), promote the evaluation of critical competencies among students in scientific and administrative fields. Using a mixed-method approach that combines quantitative and qualitative analysis, the research investigates how students validate, interpret, and use AI-generated responses, as well as the cognitive factors influencing these processes. The findings indicate that with proper guidance and training, AI significantly contributes to developing critical thinking, with reflection, information verification, and innovation serving as fundamental pillars. The paper proposes strategies to strengthen digital and critical competencies at the university level, fostering an ecosystem where artificial intelligence enhances intellectual freedom and pedagogical innovation.

PDF

References

Woolf, R. S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promise and Implications. Springer.

Brown, T. B., et al. (2020). "Language Models are Few-Shot Learners." Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901.

Facione, P. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.

Halpern, M. C. (2014). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Psychology Press.

Jenkins H. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century [Internet]. BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library). 2006. Disponible en: https://openresearchlibrary.org/viewer/035b2379-8107-48cf-a023-14a25c7f4243.

Wing J. Computational thinking and thinking about computing. IEEE [Internet]. 1 de abril de 2008;1. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1109/ipdps.2008.4536091

Ruiz-Rojas L, Salvador-Ullauri L, Acosta-Vargas P. Collaborative working and critical thinking: Adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education. Sustainability. 2024;16(13):5367. doi:10.3390/su16135367.

Bender EM, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, Shmitchell S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT’21). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021. p. 610–623. doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Carlos Eduardo Zurita Cruz, Víctor Manuel Martínez García, Yennifer Díaz Romero, José Alfredo Cobián Campos (Author)