Abstract
Introduction: This study investigates the effectiveness of Adaptive Fusion Optimization (AFO) for solving energy-efficient economic load dispatch problems on standard IEEE benchmark power systems using the MATPOWER environment under a fixed-budget, repeated-run protocol. Objective: The objective is to evaluate the performance, stability, feasibility, and scalability of AFO and compare it fairly with GA, PSO, DE, and ACO using identical evaluation budgets and population settings. Method: Experiments are conducted on IEEE 30-, 57-, and 118-bus systems. Each algorithm is executed for 30 independent runs. Performance is assessed based on mean generation cost, standard deviation, feasibility rate, and statistical validation using Friedman and Wilcoxon tests. Sensitivity analysis is performed under ±5% and ±10% load variations with ramp-rate and operational constraints enabled. Results: On the IEEE 30-bus system, AFO achieves a mean cost of 801.12 $/h with a 0.73 $/h standard deviation and 100% feasibility. On the IEEE 57-bus system, AFO maintains 96%, feasibility while delivering the lowest mean cost with reduced variability under load and ramp constraints. On the IEEE 118-bus system, AFO achieves a mean cost of 128,740.5 $/h with 100% feasibility, demonstrating strong scalability. Statistical tests confirm the significance of these improvements, and sensitivity analysis shows near-proportional cost scaling with low sensitivity to load perturbations. Conclusions: AFO provides stable, feasible, and scalable performance for economic load dispatch, outperforming traditional metaheuristics under identical conditions while maintaining robustness to demand variations through effective constraint handling.References
Aldaouab I. Optimization and Control of Smart Renewable Energy Systems. University of Dayton; 2019.
Sasson AM, Merrill HM. Some applications of optimization techniques to power systems problems. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1974;62(7):959-972. doi:10.1109/PROC.1974.9548
Khan A, Bressel M, Davigny A, Abbes D, Ould Bouamama B. Comprehensive Review of Hybrid Energy Systems: Challenges, Applications, and Optimization Strategies. Energies. 2025;18(10):2612. doi:10.3390/en18102612
Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF, Sheblé GB. Power Generation, Operation, and Control. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
Conejo AJ, Castillo E, Mínguez R, García-Bertrand R, eds. Exercise Solutions. In: Decomposition Techniques in Mathematical Programming: Engineering and Science Applications. Springer; 2006:421-529. doi:10.1007/3-540-27686-6_11
Nghitevelekwa K, Bansal RC. A review of generation dispatch with large-scale photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;81:615-624. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.035
Pei J, Mei Y, Liu J, Zhang M, Yao X. Adaptive Operator Selection for Meta-Heuristics: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence. 2025;6(8):1991-2012. doi:10.1109/TAI.2025.3545792
Marzbani F, Abdelfatah A. Economic Dispatch Optimization Strategies and Problem Formulation: A Comprehensive Review. Energies. 2024;17(3):550. doi:10.3390/en17030550
Prasad M, Akhtar MAK. Adaptive Fusion Optimization (AFO): A Hyper-Adaptive Metaheuristic with Learning-Driven Control for Global Minimization. SAP Gamification and Augmented Reality. Published online 2026. Accessed May 14, 2026. https://ideas.repec.org//a/cwf/grarti/gr2026276.html
Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sánchez CE, Thomas RJ. MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2011;26(1):12-19. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168
Visutarrom T, Chiang TC. Economic dispatch using metaheuristics: Algorithms, problems, and solutions. Applied Soft Computing. 2024;150:110891. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110891
Wang Y, Xiong G. Metaheuristic optimization algorithms for multi-area economic dispatch of power systems: Part I—a comprehensive survey. Artif Intell Rev. 2025;58(4):98. doi:10.1007/s10462-024-11070-0
Hossein L. Multi-Area Economic Dispatch Under Renewable Integration: Optimization Challenges and Research Perspectives - ProQuest. 2025. Accessed January 3, 2026. https://www.proquest.com/openview/a1c9ce2c597f07ecbb249e696d6cb4fc/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2032344
Wang Y, Xiong G. Metaheuristic optimization algorithms for multi-area economic dispatch of power systems: part II—a comparative study. Artif Intell Rev. 2025;58(5):132. doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11125-w
Wang X, Zhong H, Zhang G, Ruan G, He Y, Yu Z. Adaptive look-ahead economic dispatch based on deep reinforcement learning. Applied Energy. 2024;353:122121. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122121
Arvanitidis AI, Talbot P, Gatsis N, Alamaniotis M. Comprehensive assessment of deep reinforcement learning approaches for economic dispatch in nuclear-driven microgrids. Computers and Electrical Engineering. 2025;126:110528. doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110528
Rizki A, Touil A, Echchatbi A, Oucheikh R, Ahlaqqach M. A Reinforcement Learning-Based Proximal Policy Optimization Approach to Solve the Economic Dispatch Problem. Engineering Proceedings. 2025;97(1):24. doi:10.3390/engproc2025097024
Zhang C, Hou J, Lv X, Zhang P. Economic dispatch based on reinforcement learning using proximal policy optimization. IET Conference Proceedings. 2025;2024(33):453-460. doi:10.1049/icp.2025.0427
Pei J, Liu J, Mei Y. Learning from Offline and Online Experiences: A Hybrid Adaptive Operator Selection Framework. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. GECCO ’24. Association for Computing Machinery; 2024:1017-1025. doi:10.1145/3638529.3654062
Niu S, Wang M, Wang Y, Yang L, Zhang C, Zhang J. Real-Time Economic Dispatch Based on Safe Reinforcement Learning. Social Science Research Network. Preprint posted online February 17, 2025:5141476. doi:10.2139/ssrn.5141476
Ghaffari R, Ebrahimi R, Ghanbari M. Comprehensive Optimal Economic Dispatch Strategy Incorporating Electric Vehicles, Wind Farms, Uncertainty Correlations, and Network Security Constraints. Social Science Research Network. Preprint posted online October 4, 2025:5564175. doi:10.2139/ssrn.5564175
Abido MA. Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2002;24(7):563-571. doi:10.1016/S0142-0615(01)00067-9
MATPOWER – Free, open-source tools for electric power system simulation and optimization. 2025. Accessed January 3, 2026. https://matpower.org/
Holland JH. Genetic Algorithms. Scientific American. 1992;267(1):66-73. Accessed December 1, 2024. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24939139
Clerc M. Particle Swarm Optimization. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
Storn R, Price K. Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Journal of Global Optimization. 1997;11(4):341-359. doi:10.1023/A:1008202821328
Dorigo M, Stutzle T. Ant Colony Optimization. MIT Press; 2004.
Demšar J. Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets. J Mach Learn Res. 2006;7:1-30.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Manisha Prasad, Amir Khusru Akhtar (Author)
